Martha’s Rule rolled out at every A&E department in England

Every accident and emergency department in England is now required to operate a policy known as Martha’s Rule, the NHS has confirmed, extending a right for patients and their families to demand a second medical opinion to every acute hospital with an A&E in the country.

The policy is named after thirteen-year-old Martha Mills, who died in 2021 from sepsis after her family’s concerns about her deterioration were not acted on quickly enough. Her parents have campaigned since her death for a formal mechanism that would give patients and relatives a direct route to escalate concerns when they believe a patient’s condition is worsening and the care team is not responding with sufficient urgency.

What the rule requires

Martha’s Rule sets out a formal right for patients and their families to ask for an urgent review of a patient’s condition by a different clinical team if they are worried that the current care is not meeting the patient’s needs. Hospitals are expected to make the process clear to patients and families, and staff are expected to treat escalation requests seriously and without criticism of the person raising the concern.

The rule is intended to sit alongside, not replace, existing procedures for raising concerns about care. NHS trusts are responsible for embedding the process locally, training staff to respond, and making sure that the escalation pathway is visible to people using emergency services. The national push to roll the policy out across every A&E department in England marks the point at which what began as a family campaign has become a standard part of how the NHS expects its hospitals to handle patient concern.

Where the policy came from

Martha Mills was admitted to a major teaching hospital with a pancreatic injury after an accident. Her parents later described repeated attempts to raise concerns about her worsening condition, arguing that signs of sepsis were present and that their warnings were not acted on with the urgency they expected. Her death prompted an inquest and a sustained public campaign that combined personal grief with a focused policy argument about how hospitals should respond when relatives say a patient is getting worse.

The campaign found allies among clinicians and patient-safety advocates who argued that the underlying problem was not simply individual error but a wider willingness to treat patient and family concern as something that could be dismissed rather than investigated. For those supporters, the answer was not only better monitoring and faster recognition of sepsis but a formal right to escalation that would make it harder for a worried family to be sidelined in real time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Why it matters

The national rollout matters because it turns a specific, painful campaign into a permanent feature of emergency care. Patient safety initiatives often depend on training, culture, and compliance in ways that are difficult to see from the outside, but a formal right to a second opinion gives families something concrete to invoke when they believe a patient is being let down. That changes the dynamic between patients and staff in settings where communication has often been strained, uncertain, or defensive.

It also matters because the policy reflects a broader shift in how the NHS is thinking about patient voice. Campaigns driven by bereaved families have a long history of reshaping practice, but the results are uneven and depend heavily on local leadership. The significance of rolling Martha’s Rule out across every A&E department is that it moves the principle from a patchwork of voluntary adoption to a national expectation, which should make it harder for individual hospitals to postpone or quietly ignore the change.

What happens next

The practical test of the rollout will be whether the rule works as intended when patients and families use it. Implementation will vary from trust to trust, and the effectiveness of the policy will depend on whether staff take escalation requests seriously, whether reviews happen quickly, and whether the process is genuinely accessible to people who are frightened, tired, or unfamiliar with how hospitals work.

Patient-safety organisations, the families who campaigned for the change, and hospital leadership teams will be watching for evidence that the rule is being used, that it is changing outcomes, and that it is not becoming a procedural formality that exists on paper but not in practice. If the national rollout holds, Martha’s Rule is likely to become one of the more quietly influential changes in recent years to emergency department practice, reshaping how staff and families interact at moments of acute worry.